AOC Auxey-Duresses, Blagny, Chassagne-Montrachet, Chorey-lès-Beaune, Ladoix, Meursault, Monthélie, Pernand-Vergelesses, Puligny-Montrachet, Saint-Aubin, Saint-Romain, Santenay, Savigny-lès-Beaune machine translated reference / legal text
This text was automatically translated, so the grammar may be a little strange.
We hope this text still proves useful.
Decree of March 19, 1998 relating to certain labels of origin controlled of the Burgundy area - J.O n° 72 of March 26, 1998 Decree of August 29, 2002 modifying the decree of May 21, 1970 relating to the appellation contrôlées “Auxey-Duresses”, “Blagny”, “Chassagne-Montrachet”, “Chorey-lès-Beaune”, “Ladoix”, “Meursault”, “Monthélie”, “Pernand-Vergelesses”, “Puligny-Montrachet”, “Saint-Aubin”, “Saint-Romain”, “Santenay”, “Savigny-lès-Beaune” - J.O n° 206 of September 4, 2002 page 14690
Art 1st. -
(Modified D. May 23, 1989, Replaced D. August 29, 2002). - Only are entitled to the appellation contrôlées “Auxey-Duresses”, “Blagny”, “Chassagne-Montrachet”, “Chorey-lès-Beaune”, “Ladoix”, “Meursault”, “Monthélie”, “Pernand-Vergelesses”, “Puligny-Montrachet”, “Saint-Aubin”, “Saint-Romain”, “Santenay”, “Savigny-lès-Beaune” the red and white wines and, in certain cases noted below, the red wines or white which answer the conditions fixed hereafter.
Art 1st (a). -
(Added D. August 29, 2002). - The geographical surface of production includes/understands the territory of the following communes of the departments of Coast-in Or and Saone-et-Loire: COMMON LABEL OF ORIGIN CONTROLEE communal GOES BACK To APPROVAL of the national committee from the wines and brandies of the INAO (column A) DATE Of APPROVAL of the national committee from the wines and brandies of the INAO Délimitation of the first vintages (column B) “Auxey-Duresses” Auxey-Duresses. November 5 19981 November 5, 1981 “Blagny” Meursaults and Puligny- Montrachet 14 and March 15, 1979 14 and March 15, 1979 “Chassagne-Montrachet” Chassagne-Montrachet and Remigny February 9, 1977 February 9, 1977 “Chorey-lès-Beaune” Chorey-lès-Beaune June 2, 1988 - “Ladoix” Ladoix-Serrigny 27 and February 28, 2001 September 5, 2001 “Meursault” Meursault 25 and May 26, 2000 September 5, 2001 “Monthélie” Monthélie September 15, 1983 June 2, 1983 “Pernand-Vergelesses” Pernand-Vergelesses 27 and February 28, 2001 September 5, 2001 “Puligny-Montrachet” Puligny-Montrachet February 18, 1982 February 18, 1982 “Saint-Aubin Saint-Aubin February 9, 1977 February 9, 1977” Saint-Romain “Saint-Romain February 13, 1794 -” Santenay “Santenay and Remigny November 5, 1997 September 20, 1984” Savigny-lès-Beaune “Savigny-lès-Beaune June 7, 1985 June 7, 1985 the wines being entitled to the names mentioned in the table above result from grape harvest collected on a surface delimited by pieces or part of pieces, as approved, on Commission proposal of experts indicated to this end, by the national committee of the wines and brandies of the national Institute of the labels of origin, in its meetings mentioned in column A. the compartmental surface thus delimited is deferred on the cadrastal maps deposited to the town hall of the communes concerned. In certain cases, the appellation contrôlée considered could be applied only to only one category of wines: white or reds; mention will be related from there to the corresponding plans.
Art 1st for the third time. -
(Added D. August 29, 2002) - the wines being entitled comprising to names of the climates classified in first vintage result from grape harvest collected on a surface delimited by pieces or part of pieces, as approved, on Commission proposal of experts indicated to this end, by the national committee of the wines and brandies of the national Institute of the labels of origin, in its meetings mentioned in column B. the compartmental surface thus delimited is deferred on the cadrastal maps deposited to the town hall of the communes concerned.
Art 1st quater. -
(Added D. August 29, 2002) - the climates classified in “first vintage” are fixed in the list approved by the national committee of the wines and brandies of the national Institute of the labels of origin, on Commission proposal of experts indicated to this end in its meetings mentioned in column B. the list and the cadrastal maps defining the territory of the climates classified in “first vintage” are deposited with the town hall of the communes concerned. For the wines produced in the pieces classified in “first vintage”, communal name referred to above must be supplemented either by the name of the climate of origin, or by the expression “first believed”, or by one and the other. The mention “first believed” and the name of the climate of origin must be placed after that of the name communal and printed in characters whose dimensions, as well in height as in width, will not have to exceed those of name. For the other climates of origin not classified in “first vintage” under the conditions envisaged with the preceding subparagraph, the name of the climate could be printed in characters whose dimensions, as well in height as in width, will not have to exceed half of those of name. The wines resulting from the climates of Montrachet, Knight-Montrachet, Bastard-Montrachet, Welcome-Bastard-Montrachet, Criots-Bastard-Montrachet (having been the subject of special decrees of dated July 31, 1937 control), which would not meet the conditions giving them right to the appellation contrôlée of climate, could be designated under their communal name followed by the expression “first believed” if they answer the regulations specified below, for the use of this designation. For the red wines, the name of the one of the names mentioned with the article 1st (a) could be followed words: “Coast of Beaune”, thus forming an inseparable name having to be printed in identical characters, of the same form, even dimension, even color. These red wines will also be entitled to the appellation contrôlée “Coast of Beaune-Villages”, the words “Coast of Beaune” and “Villages” having to be connected by a hyphen and to be reproduced on the same line in identical characters, of the same dimension, even form, even color and thus forming an inseparable name.
Art 2. -
The wines being entitled to names referred to above will have to come from following type of vines, other than all others: For the red wines: “Pinot noirien”, “Pinot beurot”, “Pinot liebault”, For the white wines: “Chardonnay and white Pinot”. The local use to incorporate in the vintage intended to produce red wines of the white type of vine vintage: Chardonnay, white Pinot and gray Pinot, of which the percentage can amount to 15% to the maximum, remain authorized. Any wine producer of the appellation contrôlées defined by this decree which will plant or replant hybrids inside the delimited surface will not be able to assert the right to names.
Art 3. -
(Replaced, D.1er October 1985, Modified, D. May 23, 1989). - To have right respectively to the appellation contrôlées “Auxey-Duresses”, “Blagny”, “Chassagne-Montrachet”, “Chorey-lès-Beaune”, “Ladoix”, “Meursault”, “Monthélie”, “Pernand-Vergelesses”, “Puligny-Montrachet”, “Saint-Aubin”, “Saint-Romain”, “Santenay” and “Savigny-lès-Beaune”, the wines must come from collected grapes with good maturity and present a minimum natural voluminal title alcoholometric of: 10,5% for the red wines; 11% for the white wines. Cannot be regarded as being with good maturity any unit batch of vintage having a high content in sugar lower than: 171 grams per liter of must for the red wines; 170 grams per liter of must for the white wines. Moreover, when the authorization of enrichment by dry sugaring is granted, the wines should not exceed a total voluminal alcoholometric title of 13,5% for the red wines and 14% for the white wines, under penalty of losing the right to name considered. The wines for which the addition either of the name of the climate of origin was asserted, or from the expression” first believed “, or from the one and other, with that of the one of the appellation contrôlées referred to above, must come from collected grapes with good maturity and present a minimum natural voluminal title alcoholometric of: 11% for the red wines; 11,5% for the white wines. Cannot be regarded as being with good maturity any unit batch of vintage having a high content in sugar lower than: 180 grams per liter of must for the red wines; 178 grams per liter of must for the white wines. Moreover, when the authorization of enrichment by dry sugaring is granted, the wines should not exceed a total voluminal alcoholometric title of 14% for the red wines and 14,5% for the white wines, under penalty of losing the right to name considered. However, the benefit of one or the other of names referred to above can be granted to the wines of a total voluminal title alcoholometric higher than the limits referred to above and worked out without any enrichment, if the informant justifies of a certificate could not be declared after harvest, offered to the public, delivered by the national Institute of the labels of origin of the wines and brandies after investigation carried out into his request presented before the vintage of the vines concerned. The notifications of the exemptions aimed to the preceding subparagraph must be addressed to the local services of the general direction of the taxes and the direction of the consumption and the repression of the frauds. The limits aimed to the subparagraphs above can be modified when the climatic conditions justify it by joint decree of the Minister for agriculture and the minister in charge with the budget and consumption, on proposal of the national Institute of the labels of origin of the wines and brandies, after opinion of the interested producers' associations.
Art 4. -
(Modified, D. August 26, 1982, D. May 21, 1989). [The basic output aimed to the article 1st of decree 74.872 of modified October 19, 1974 relating to the producing output of the vineyards of the wines with name “Auxey Duresses”, “Chassagne Montrachet”. , “Chorey-lès-Beaune”, “Ladoix”, “Meursault”, “Monthélie”, “Pernand Vergelesses”, “Puligny Montrachet”, “Holy Aubin”, “Holy Romain”, “Santenay”, “Savigny-lès-Beaune”, “Coast of Beaune Villages”, “Coast of Beaune” preceded by the name of the commune of origin, with 40 hectolitres for the red wines and 45 hectolitres for the white wines per hectare and the wines of name “Blagny” to 40 hectolitres per hectare. Only can profit from an output higher than the basic output, within the maximum limit of the limiting ceiling of classification, for a given surface of vine producing of the wines being entitled to names quoted above, the informants who made of it the request at the national Institute of the labels of origin before the vintage of the vines in question and which were subjected to the checking of their harvest by the commission of five members envisaged with the article 1st of the decree modified 74.872 of October 19, 1974.] (Al 2, 3 and 4 repealed D. 74.872 of October 19.) [See also decrees 74.872 of October 19, 74.958 modified of November 20, - limiting ceiling of classification: 20%]. Moreover, when one collecting asserts in its declaration of harvest the benefit of several appellation contrôlées, the output with the hectare declared for any of its names will not be able to exceed that declared for another name of a wine of comparable nature (white or red) whose ceiling of output is higher than that of name considered, except justification found valid after investigation of the national Institute of the labels of origin. [(D. 87.854 of October 22, 1987). - The benefit of name can be granted to the wines coming from the young vines only as from the second year following that during which the plantation was carried out places from there before August 31.]
Art 5. -
The wines being entitled to names referred to above will have to come from vines which will have been planted and cut, in accordance with the provisions of the decree of September 17, 1956.
Art 6. -
(Modified, D. March 19, 1998) - the wines being entitled to the names defined by this decree will have to come from collected with good maturity and vinified grapes, in accordance with the local practice. They will profit from all the oenological processes currently authorized by the laws and payments in force.
Art 7. -
The wines for which, at the end of this decree, the appellation contrôlées defined by this same decree will be asserted and which will be presented under the aforementioned names could not be declared after harvest, be offered to the public, be dispatched, put on sale or sold without in the declaration of harvest, the advertisements, on the leaflets, unspecified labels, invoices, containers the labels of origin referred to above being registered and are accompanied by the mention “appellation contrôlée”, the whole in very apparent characters.
Art 8. -
The use of any indication or any sign likely to make believe in the purchaser that wines are entitled to the appellation contrôlées defined by this decree, whereas they does not answer all the conditions fixed by this same decree, will be continued, in accordance with the general legislation on the frauds and the protection of the art, labels of origin (L. August 1, 1905 1st and 2; L. May 6, 1919, art 8; D. August 19, 1921, art 13) without damage of the sanctions of a tax nature, if it is necessary.
Art 9. -
Are repealed: the 2° of the article 1st of the decree of July 31, 1937, the decree of June 13, 1939 except for the article 1st, and the decree of October 14, 1947 relating to the definition of the appellation contrôlée Saint-Romain. However, until the deposit in town hall of the plans envisaged with the 2nd subparagraph of the article 1st of this decree, the surfaces of production of the communes enumerated with the article 1st referred to above remain those envisaged by the decree of June 13, 1939 relating to each corresponding label of origin of the Coast of Beaune and by the decree of October 14, 1947 defining the appellation contrôlée Saint-Romain. Avertissement : Les informations présentées sur ce site font l'objet d'une clause de non responsabilitéINAO_19700521_17202/11/2006 Document téléchargeable : AOC_Auxey-Duresses_-_2002.doc